3 Things Wrong With The Rewards System
Most schools use a rewards and incentives system for teaching children. They are particularly prominent in younger classes where you will see things like star charts and sticker boards. The idea is that the a student earns stars or stickers or happy faces for good behavior and gets nothing (or maybe frown faces) for bad behavior.
Before I talk about some of things wrong with this system, let me first say that it is way better than a strict “do as the authority figure says or get punished” method. It actually tries to establish a consistent set of rules for what constitutes good behavior and leans much more on the rewards side as an incentive. Compared to a system that essentially treats kids like slaves to be yelled at and bullied into behaving, the rewards and incentives approach is a great leap forward (China pun, har har).
The rewards system is to strict authority what democracy is to dictatorship. Sure, democracy is better than dictatorship, but it’s still a piece of shit. Here are three things that are wrong with the rewards system:
1. It Only Teaches One Thing: Obedience
The reward system is supposed to incentivize good behavior but what it really does is teach children that being “good” means following the authority figures’ rules. Now it doesn’t really matter what the teacher defines as good behavior. It might be not talking during class or always raising your hand before asking a question. Sometimes it’s just a reward for the correct answer — which sends a terrible message to the kids that don’t know the correct answer: you’re not good.
This is especially bad when you have a big old heap of arbitrary classroom rules. For example, my Chinese assistants don’t want the kids to talk during their meals. They have a good reason for it: there is only limited time to eat and once the kids start talking they almost always ignore their food. Then lunch will end and won’t be finished and they’ll be hungry the rest of the day. But if you combine this with the rewards system you end rewarding the kids that sit quietly during their meal and punishing (with frowny faces or loss of playtime) the kids that chat while eating.
I don’t know about you guys, but punishing a kid for talking while he’s eating seems like a pretty asshole thing to do. And it certainly isn’t going to teach them anything about morality. The only lesson they will get is do what you’re told and you’ll be rewarded.
What if the rules are rational and fair? Well that certainly would be better, but I’ve just never seen it. Sure there are classroom rules about hitting and fighting — I would consider those “rational” — but there are plenty more that are about things like sitting quietly, listening to the assistants, sharing toys, not speaking out of turn, lining up before going outside, washing hands before food, etc. Again, rewarding a kid for lining up before going outside just teaches them to obey authority, nothing more.
Even if you could establish a set of rational rules, I think the message would be the same. The authority you were learning to obey would be less random and make more sense, but you’d still be learning to obey. Consistent and reasonable authority is absolutely better than random and arbitrary authority, for sure, but the lesson is unchanged.
2. It Punishes The Wrong Person
Wait, what? I’ll explain. If I’m teaching a lesson and my students aren’t listening, if they are talking amongst themselves, or staring bored out the window how is that their fault? I’m the one who is being paid to teach them. It’s my job to make my lessons and engaging and interesting. If the kids are finding my lessons boring or uninteresting I’m pretty sure that it’s my fault, not theirs.
Instead of giving them frowny faces for not listening or stars for paying attention maybe I should just focus on being a better teacher. My students don’t owe me anything, and rewarding them for paying attention to my boring ass flashcard game is just a lazy excuse for being a shitty teacher.
It applies for almost every classroom rule that you might enforce using the rewards system. You can’t settle disputes between children without the threat of a frowny face? Fail. You can’t get the students to wash their hands before eating unless you give them stickers? Fail.
I’m not saying that it’s easy to do. It’s hard as hell. I know. I’m struggling to do it. But I refuse to switch to a system that punishes or rewards the students because of my shortcomings.
3. It Establishes Artificial Consequences
When it comes to kids you hear a lot of talk about having to teach them the “consequences” of their actions. This is always done by making up some bullshit fake consequence and then imposing it on them. This is often the excuse you hear for spanking kids. Besides it being just plain wrong to hit a kid, the excuse of “it teachers them consequences” is so retarded I hate even having to address it.
Guess what everybody? In the “real world” as “mature adults” you don’t get spanked for not behaving. Excluding the one violent relationship we are all forced to participate in with our benevolent political masters, nobody is allowed to use force against you when you “don’t behave.”
What are the types of consequences we do have to face? Well, there are the outright cause and effect ones. For example, if you don’t eat, you die. These are pretty straight forward and no child needs to be taught cause and effect through punishments and rewards. Kids learn cause and effect just by interacting with the world.
There are other types of consequences too, like how your actions affect others emotionally. These aren’t learned as easily as the physical cause and effect consequences, but you don’t need a rewards system to teach them. In fact a rewards system can’t teach these types of consequences. The only way you grow to understand the emotional effects of your actions is through empathy. You have empathy for yourself and understand how others effect you and then you have empathy for others and understand how you effect them. How do you encourage this in kids? That’s probably a topic for another post, but I think you start by showing them empathy.

User Comments
First days in my new profession | It's Always Sunny In South Korea
03/01/10
[...] have star charts, but the more I thought about it, the less I was inclined to use mine. This great post from Chinarchy, a blog written by two English teachers in China, explains some of the negatives of [...]
Nathan
03/01/10
Brilliant post! Man LLC needs writers like you.
Robby
03/01/10
Great read and message.
Anderson
03/01/10
Thanks guys! I was wondering what you would think of it, Nate, after seeing your PET post on facebook.
Glad you enjoyed it. I’m definitely going to write a lot more on this subject. I think it’s far more complex then I indicated in this post.
MaikUniversum
03/01/10
Great article.
Anderson
03/01/10
Thanks!
Heiko Cochius
03/01/10
Very insightful article. I believe it is hard as hell to work in a system that is designed to produce obedience and have the attitudes and insights about the system that you have. I probably would not be able to do it.
Kirsten
03/01/10
Wow, is it refreshing to read an article like this. Thanks for pointing out that a reward encourages obedience–just as punishment does! And you’re right, a good teacher doesn’t need a reward system. My parents made plenty of mistakes with my siblings and me, but they were good teachers. When my mother taught me to read and write, when my father taught me to swim, and whenever either of my parents held a friendly two-way conversation with me, I needed no other “discipline.” Thanks for reminding me.
Anderson
03/01/10
Thanks for the comment Kirsten. I’m glad you enjoyed the article
I’d love to hear what you think about some of the other teaching related pieces.
Tobi
03/01/10
I, too, enjoyed reading your comments. It was refreshing to read pure, unrestrained comments and criticism. However, what are we to do with those students who don’t have the conversations with their parents (aka teachers), as Kirsten mentioned? Those who don’t even see their parent(s) or eat a meal with them? Also, I would love to have conversations with students and really get to know them, but with over 25 in my class, more duties during the work day, furlough days, no pay raises, blah, blah, blah, I cannot physically or mentally find the time to do this. Sure, some of my lessons could use a little more excitement, but there is something to be said about reading from the text – which is the form in which my school system assesses student learning. I also don’t agree with it being all my fault. Society, tv, video games, single parent households, etc. are out of my control. Instead of using the behavior charts, I’d prefer to use other students as role models so the “lessons” learned could be more geared toward real world expectations. Still, using the charts in class coupled with home interventions can be very successful – you know the whole village thing.
Thanks for allowing me the opportunity to “vent” and add my comments to a topic I struggle with every day.
Anderson
03/01/10
Hey Tobi,
I really enjoyed your comment. I think you got to the heart of the issue: new, better ways of relating to and organizing children in your classroom aren’t possible because of the systemic problems in schools.
I can’t really offer any advice, but I think you might enjoy my audio post about group learning. You can listen here: http://www.chinarchy.com/2010/06/against-group-learning-2/